Then, they got up and moved to the next computer, where they clicked on the little speech bubble above various major subsets and made comments, in complete sentences, that pertained. For example: cholera flavum colore est. cholera in stomacho fit. melancholia homines lassitudine afficit.
They were given five minutes at each computer to comment on as many things as they could. They circled around the room, so every student visited every computer. You can also draw in the boxes, so students illustrated various diseases and remedies.
Once they were finished, I asked the groups to color-code their topics appropriately (inside the body and outside, plants vs. animals, etc), if necessary. Then, they posted them to a common forum, where they became their test study guide.
I could easily see this for lower levels as well: character maps, topic maps, story webs, vocab webs, etc. You could ask them to write sentences with pertinent vocab, or there wouldn't have to be, necessarily, even independent production from the students - pertinent lines could be extracted from texts. Students could go around adding major topics to each others' webs and then have to include a certain number of comments, etc. The webs can be exported as PDFs, or they can be shared as links or on social media, and they can be embedded on websites. All in all, the feeling has been that it is useful in collating information and asking them to recall various ideas, as well as adding their own thoughts and assessments.
No comments:
Post a Comment